A Drag Queen at Drag Queen Story Hour
Drag Queen Story Hour began as a small event in San Francisco, but has since exploded in popularity, with over one-hundred events worldwide.

If you thought you’d heard the last of the wildly controversial Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH), you thought wrong. Drag Queen Story Hour, equal parts celebrated and condemned, has now come to Minnesota, and some legislators in the Gopher State aren’t taking too kindly to it.

Five Minnesota Republicans are going so far as to propose a bill that would slash all government aid to public libraries that host Drag Queen Story Hour, which were conceived to provide young children more positive LGBTQ role models in a fun and wholesome environment.

The response from the public was not exactly what the legislators had in mind.

"All five of us immediately began receiving hate email which continued throughout the evening and all night long," reported Eric Lucero, one of the bill’s sponsors. His post on Facebook drew hundreds of comments pro and con, with many outraged that, in the midst of a pandemic, their legislators were focused on defunding libraries for letting drag queens read to children.

Still, they had plenty of defenders. One commenter stated, “Stand your ground!! Be like PRESIDENT TRUMP!!! Shrug it off. There are more on your side . Please every Christian STAND UP!!!!”

A Global Phenomenon

DQSH began as a small operation in San Francisco that has since ballooned into a global phenomenon, with well over one hundred events every year.

Turns out, kids love being read to by these sparkly and often larger-than-life characters that will take children age 3 through 8 through a riveting 45 minutes of storytelling, sing-alongs, dress-up time, face-painting and other arts and crafts. Many parents, for their part, really seem to love the idea of showing their kids that it’s okay to be different.

And yet these same events have drawn protestors - mostly evangelical Christians - who denounce them as inappropriate, hyper-sexualized and unnecessarily promoting homosexual lifestyles that ultimately lead children astray from the Bible's teachings.

Some have even taken their objections to the courthouse. A group in Texas called “Christ Followers” actually sued the city of Houston for allowing DQSH in their local library under the basis that the event violated their religious freedom - although, it should be noted, nobody forced them or their children to attend.

A federal judge ultimately dismissed their suit.

The Fight Never Ends

The battle continues, and Minnesota Republican Rep Mary Franson is on the front line. She had made it clear that she is most certainly not in favor of DQSH. She claimed that it's “outrageous” that “publicly funded institutions would put on such programming.”

Does she have a point? Videos have emerged of some of these events, and while reading to kids is one thing, risqué dancing is another.

While this behavior is an outlier, it drew swift condemnation from commenters, who called it everything from "sick" to "demonic". One suggested that "The FBI seriously needs to check the hard drive of everyone in that room right now."

Still, the proposed anti-DQSH bill will likely be dead on arrival in the Democratically-controlled House, which has critics dismissing it as a minor publicity stunt.

But these sorts of political stunts can also undo what proponents argue is an innocent, feel-good and highly successful initiative designed to create a kinder world for everyone, and to show how easy it is for all of us to get along.

However, is there a line for these type of events? Can things get a little out of hand, even with the best of intentions?

What do you think? Do the Republican Representatives have a point? Or should public libraries have the freedom to hold whatever events they choose?


  1. Tom Thackrey's Avatar Tom Thackrey

    I believe that the hate taught by the anti-LGBTQ so called Christians is far more harmful to children than any DQSH. One of the most positive school experiences, for me, was an English teacher who took it upon herself, in 1967, to explain homosexuality. I had no idea. She presented gays as people with different preferences. It did not make me gay, later, when I met some, I was able to see them for the people they are and not a threat, not an abomination, and nothing to be feared.

    1. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

      And you should not have had to deal with this when you were 7 or 8. When you were mature enough to deal with this then and only then should you have to have this explained to you. Thats all I am saying and if you cant accept that then mores the pity

  1. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

    As well they should. If these men want to read to the kids then they should do it as men. Children of that age have enough of a decision making process to figure out if they like green beans or not. They dont need a man dressed as a woman showing up in front of them. Maybe after they turn 12 or 13 then this can be explained to them but at the age of six or seven, for Gods sake let them be kids as long as possible.

    1. CB's Avatar CB

      Thoroughly agree.

    2. Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey's Avatar Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey

      People like you with your bigoted, transphobic attitude are and will always be the problem and never the solution.

      1. Dr. Darryl G Dykes's Avatar Dr. Darryl G Dykes

        A simple answer is this leave sexual orientation to young adults 8th graders and above. I remember in my public school, we students where taught in 8th grade the physical anatomy of the human body. Not that only people married should have sex but just the facts without including the act of love or orientation just the biological facts. We were taught not to hate anyone and left the parents to teach about relationships

      2. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

        call names all you wish, but the fact remains the same. Let the children be children for as long as possible. Later when they are mature enough to deal with this then explain it to them.

        If you cant or wont understand that then mores the pity for you

    3. John D. Partin's Avatar John D. Partin

      So, Daniel Gray, your condemnation of men wearing women's clothing while reading to children would also condemn Milton Berle's or Flip Wilson's dressing up as women and reading to children or their performing while dressed as women during their acts and entertaining children and adults by doing so. Condemning Uncle Miltie is un-American because he was the quintessential American comedian and Flip Wilson entertained us all with Geraldine! Then, there was Robin Williams as Mrs. Doubtfire, who had a children's show and read to children in the movie. RuPaul, no doubt, entertains and instructs many children in his Drag Race series on LogoTV. There have been many performers who have dressed up as women and entertained and instructed both adults and children down through history. Elizabethan theater had men playing both male and female parts. It's very late and hypocritical to decide or say after all this time and history that "men should never dress up in women's clothes to read to children or entertain us". 12 or 13 is too late to expose children to different lifestyles and expressions of people because, by that time, they are already becoming hardened or already hardened in their views and prejudices and so not open to becoming accepting of other people. This, in turn, will have an adverse effect upon society from their discriminating against other people because of those views as they grow older and more entrenched in their views, and teaching that unacceptance and bigotry to their children, and so on into the future. The time to teach children acceptance of and openness toward others is while their minds are still uncluttered by all the homophobia and prejudices affecting older children and adults, which is during pre-school years.

      1. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

        No I am just saying let children be children for as long as possible. While I thought Milton Berle and Flip Wilson was funny, i should not have to be explaining this to a 7 year old child. If you cant understand that then I feel sorry for you. And that means the rest of your post is just huff and puff. Deal with it

      2. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

        No while I thought Milton and Flip were funny, I was old enough to accept what they were doing. A child of 7 or 8 has trouble accepting what they want for supper that night or their school work. let them be children for as long as possible and then when they are mature enough then explain it to them. Why you cant seem to understand this is well beyond reasonable common sense.

        1. John D. Partin's Avatar John D. Partin

          Why you can't seem to understand that acceptance of other people's lifestyles and expressions have to be learned early in life, while children's minds are still open and uncluttered by prejudices, and not be put off until age 12 or 13, when people are already becoming more entrenched in their thinking, is what is really beyond reasonable common sense!! No truly reasonable person expects closed or becoming closed minded people to be open to accepting other people or new ideas. That is a contradiction in terms!! Closed-mindedness isn't conducive at all to being open-minded or open and accepting of other people!! That is just obvious common sense and should be obvious to you and everyone else, who actually has common sense. So, if it isn't obvious to you, that excludes you from the ranks of the sensible people of the world! This is obvious to everyone to whom it can be obvious and so if it isn't obvious to you, there is an obvious reason for that. You aren't able to get it or honestly admit it!! Acceptance of other people can't possibly come out of unacceptance and closed-mindedness about them!! Children's being accepting of different lifestyles and expressions of people and being taught acceptance and openness toward people doesn't interfere with their being children, except according to you and your ilk, who want to indoctrinate children to think and feel and speak about these people and everything the same as you do. That is your version of "letting children just be children": making them little warmed over copies of yourselves and continuing this bigotry for another generation and on into the future!! Acceptance and openness actually make children more childlike and innocent, truer to their nature. That is why Jesus said: "Except you have faith as a little child, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven". Children will play with children of different races and watch and listen to drag queens reading them stories and do many other things innocently, until they are told by supposedly "wiser" (actually, more stupid) adults to "stick with your own kind", "don't listen to those 'sick' men in dresses", and impose other of their prejudices upon those innocent young minds!! That is how bigots become bigots!! I feel sorry for you if you really don't see or understand that and you are the one who is just huffing and puffing here!!! You are always talking about other people "name calling" against you, but have no problem name calling on me and other people here, which is a double standard and hypocrisy for you!!

          1. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

            And I will turn your own words right back on you. Why cant YOU accept the life style of people who dont want some drag queen in the public library reading to our kids? You want people to accept them then hows about you accept that most normal people dont think its right or natural for a guy with a beard dressing like a woman. The more you try and force this in peoples faces the more they are going to resist.

        2. John D. Partin's Avatar John D. Partin

          Children don't have a problem with drag queens reading stories to them or with children of different races or with people of other religions or with many other things until the so-called "adults" in their lives and in the room pour their poison into these innocent young persons' minds and start them down the path to becoming just the same as them, so that they can poison other young people's minds in their turn, and keep this going on and on into the future!! If you say that children's innocence should be protected and they should be allowed to just be children, why would you then turn right around and take that innocence away from them and steal their childhood by pouring your poison of homophobia, transphobia, racism, xenophobia, religious bigotry, and other hatefulness into their innocent young minds, as Klansmen, Black Muslims, homophobes, and others of your ilk do?!! Are you really incapable of seeing and understanding the hypocrisy of demanding that children not be "corrupted" by those who are only trying to teach them to be more accepting of and loving toward other people, but then turning right around and corrupting them yourselves by turning them into smaller copies of yourselves with your hatefulness toward gay people, transgendered people, other races and religions, etc.? Or do you just not give a damn that you're being hypocrites and think that it's not hypocrisy if you just refuse to admit it?!! Who protects the children from you, their supposed "protectors"?!! You and your ilk admit that children need to learn the language of their country early and not wait until they are older to try to learn it because it will be much harder for them to do it then. You admit that children should start learning how to read and write when they are very young or, again, it will be much harder if they wait until they are older to start learning. You admit that children need to learn many things early in their lives and not put that off until they are older, since they will have a harder time of it; but, for some not so mysterious reason, (your homophobia and transphobia!), you "think", inconsistently, that children should put off learning acceptance and openness about other people until they are much older, though it will also be much harder for them, then, or even never learn that at all, though that will make them hateful to other people and problematic in society!!! It is as important or even far more important for children to learn acceptance and openness and love toward other people early in life as it is for them to learn language, reading, writing, arithmetic, and other things because love, acceptance, and openness make our society even as peaceful as it is and will make it even more so if this acceptance, love, and openness are taught and practiced more!! Hitler didn't just wake up one morning and, out of the blue, decide to start hating and killing Jews and other people. His whole life and experiences beforehand turned him into what he became. If he had been taught acceptance, love, and openness toward other people, instead of the hate that he was taught, the Holocaust and W.W.Ii and the deaths of 6 million Jews and 50 million others might never have happened. The same goes if serial killers and other murderers and criminals had been taught acceptance, love, and openness toward other people, instead of what they were taught by the world, since they wouldn't, then, have committed the murders and other crimes that they committed. So, this teaching of acceptance, love, and openness toward other people isn't impractical or pie-in-the-sky, but is extremely necessary and practical for our own protection and good!!

  1. Rev. Sandy's Avatar Rev. Sandy

    These crazy uneducated religious fanatics need to get a life. They have nothing better to do then push hate. When will they start listening to the experts then just keep pushing their sick agendas on people they oppose. The world would be a better place if these people got an education on science and phycology. But most important if they practiced love and acceptance.

    1. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

      The world would be a better place if you would stop pushing your nonsense. All this is is just another left leaning group trying to tell everyone else that a man dressing as a woman is normal. Whats is the next one you are going to try? That pedophiles should be left alone because they are born that way. Oh wait that defense has ALREADY been tried in Los Angeles California and is working its way through the courts to the 9th US District Court.

      Just because people like to believe in science is no call for you to call then uneducated religious fanatics. You want to make a statement then back it up with facts good, otherwise all it is is name calling on your end and does nothing to or for the thread not to mention showing your ignorance and bias, the same thing you are accusing others of.

      1. Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey's Avatar Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey

        Quit trying to compare apples to oranges. YOU are the one showing how bigoted, intolerant, and biased you are. Religious fanatics do NOT like science because then they have to actually use critical thinking skills.

        1. Dr. Darryl G Dykes's Avatar Dr. Darryl G Dykes

          All people have some intolerance to something. We as grown adults need to understand this. Just because you don't like something another person tolerates does not mean they are automatically wrong. Don't hate someone because you disagree with their thoughts and belifes and don't get the Childern involved in adult situations. Think about what you say in front of Childern, what you say may do harm that may never be reversed

        2. Dr. Darryl G Dykes's Avatar Dr. Darryl G Dykes

          Comment has been removed.

        3. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

          I am comparing apples to apples you have just last September one drag queen named Dylan Pontiff, a gay man who helps organise DQSHs for pre-schoolers, admitted the purpose of the story hour is the grooming of the next generation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niWNO4p1L-0 . Pontiff boldly acclaimed, “we are trying to groom the next generation to not see the way that they just did.” Yes, there is a fight on to educate children beyond anything previously known, accepted and with indeterminable consequences. SO you need to open your eyes child and have a come to reality moment

  1. SibylTheHeretic's Avatar SibylTheHeretic

    This issue has nothing to do with religion. But the Christians seem to be the first to discover their backbone and point out that the emperor has no clothes. The liberal continue to promote aberrant behavior. The weirder the behavior the more the liberal encourage it and cry discrimination if someone questions them. Teaching children to become weirdos is going to far. If an adult decides on their own to live as a different species then they deserve the discrimination. Oh but their just men harmlessly dressing as women. Oh but they are just men sodomising each other. Oh but they are just men looking at pictures of little children. Oh but the schools are just teaching children that they really don't know what sex they are and its alright to change teams. Well this is all crap and the liberal agenda is to promote and encourage all aberrant behavior. Liberals are evil.

    1. Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey's Avatar Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey

      LOL! YES it does you self serving, fanatical loon.

    2. Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey's Avatar Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey

      LOL! YES it does you self serving, fanatical loon.

    3. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

      and yet you have drag queens who are gay admitting they are grooming the next generation by going after the children. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niWNO4p1L-0 I say leave the children alone. Teach them to be kind to everyone they meet but they dont need to know about gay or straight until they are old enough to understand it. 7 or 8 years old is way too young.

  1. bonnieomerjohnson's Avatar bonnieomerjohnson

    Let's think about the purpose of the bill. Will such a bill, if it should pass, be a positive for Christianity? If proclaimed Christians wish to set an example or be a witness, wouldn't it be more impactful to do so with acts of love? Public libraries are and should remain uncensored. I suspect many drag queens are excellent readers who make a library experience memorable and promote reading as they demonstrate a dramatic flair. I doubt children will influenced to become drag queens if their personalities don't align with the behavior and if it does, so what? Personally, drag behavior, drag shows, or drag queen story hour is not my preferred form of entertainment, but it does no harm. And I am a mother and grandmother in my seventies,, but I think a person's energy is better spent when minding one's own business and spends time developing integrity, character, generosity, compassion and other "Christian" traits instead of judging too harshly. De-funding libraires is not a solution and proves more detrimental to a community than is helpful to its citizens.

    1. Patricia Ann Wileman's Avatar Patricia Ann Wileman

      When it comes to kids I disagree Because you think any and everything is ok don't push it down the throats of kids. Do it in your own place. Government should not be paying to have this crap. I your a man read as a man. If your a women read as a women. What you do with your private life is fine. Each of us have free choice. Kids don't get that choice tell there of age.

    2. Dr. Darryl G Dykes's Avatar Dr. Darryl G Dykes

      Jesus Christ himself became intolerant of sin in the Temple, did he not overturn the tables of the money changers? You can love without tolerating everything people do.

  1. Mark Hannon's Avatar Mark Hannon

    I used to be in a reading program for children that were described as "at risk". They just needed an adult to care about them and they had no judgement of that adult. So the school board decided not to fund a teacher/supervisor for the program, of course.

  1. Rev. Pam Field's Avatar Rev. Pam Field

    The world would be a better place if love was the agenda of everyone. Live and let live is the way to peace. Complaining about how others live their lives is a waste of time and effort. Evil does as evil does, just as love does as love does. We each choose our way in this life for better or worse. We each will experience the consequence of our actions, God or no God, Devil or no Devil...it boils down to just plain "Good and Evil", my way or the highway, and who cares anyway? No one can make anyone change or do what another seems the right thing to do.

    As you can see all it does is spread hate, judgement, resentment, rebellion, prideful arrogance and separation within the "Universal Family of Existence". Christians should remember it is written that one should hate the sin, but not the sinner. To be examples, share their knowledge, love, and compassion for all. You can not use "the rod" on adults who have made up their minds and hearts. Their duty is to pray for others not condemn. One scripture I have come to live by is in Revelations 22 v 11-12: "Let him who does wrong continue to do wrong; let him who is vile continue to be vile; let him who does right continue to do right; and let him who is holy continue to be holy." Behold, I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to everyone according to what he has done." "He" of course is meant for "She" or something in between for those who may want to protest.

  1. Lionheart's Avatar Lionheart

    Yes, who wants men, wearing dresses, teaching children stories? Oh but wait......Priests, Cardinals, Popes, and Islamists wear dresses. Now I know some of you are going to say, but they don’t wear dresses per se, but how do children know that?


    1. Br'er George's Avatar Br'er George

      And of course we know how the dress wearing priests think of children and I don't want them to read anything to my kids either!

    2. Daniel Gray's Avatar Daniel Gray

      Sorry but they are not dresses Lionhart, and as usual you attack someones religion. This is getting old. The priest’s ROBES are a ceremonial vesture—a uniform of their sacred office. They are meant to effectively obliterate the priest’s personality. They are also, by the way, meant to be unobtrusive. They should not be creative or clever or call attention to the smart vestment designer or the wonderful seamstress. They are simply to dignify the office of the priest and dignify and beautify the celebration of Mass.

      I know thats going to be had for you to understand with your anti religion attitude, but the facts remain that you are wrong again, as usual.

      1. Lionheart's Avatar Lionheart

        I know they are not dresses Daniel, but do children, especially those being molested by Priests who have fallen into the trap of religion denying them normal sexual relations with a spouse?


  1. Benson Smith's Avatar Benson Smith

    Repression of sexuality seems to be at the root of this problem. What is next - "Horndog Story Hour" with sleazy old guys reading Little Red Riding Hood and smacking their chops? But seriously, entertaining children using reference to sexuality is more about the grown up than the children, and not that appropriate in my opinion.

    1. Dr. Darryl G Dykes's Avatar Dr. Darryl G Dykes

      Comment has been removed.

  1. Tiffany Umayat Cryer's Avatar Tiffany Umayat Cryer

    I think it is important that children understand other people. Book characters are informant for children their age. This way they can learn about others without the prejudice of their peers putting their opinions of people on them. This way they can make their own decisions to love their neighbors as God teaches

  1. William R. Schott's Avatar William R. Schott

    According to the KJV, it states in the book of Genesis that God created ADAM and EVE, No I do not agree with letting this be done in the school system of be taught about in the school system. God created ADAM and EVE, God said no man should be alone so god took a rib from Adam and made woman then had Adam to name her then she was call EVE. Far as the gay community that should be something the parents of the child teach not out education teachers that need to be teach about math, English, American history, which is more important than gay community. Most of all they need to start teaching the BIBLE again

  1. John Daly's Avatar John Daly

    You call the attempted legislation a "political stunt?" So we obviously know where u come from ULC. Drag Queen Story hour is an abomination that goes against all natural law. Does not matter what religion you practice or dont practice. There is only one reason an organization would promote this today. That is to destroy western civilization. I see some of the commentors here have stated that science is on the side of the leftist deviates trying to destroy the family. The left has turned science upside down and twisted it to support their agenda. Science is no longer science. I dont believe God will set this right. God is waiting for man to fix this mess. He will.

  1. Rev. Jonathan Peebles's Avatar Rev. Jonathan Peebles

    Pedophilia? Really? The children are laughing and it is fun for them and is it no way about sex. So many religious people are ridiculous that is why I never use the world and most dress the way they do because it is fun and entertainment not so people can get there man panties in a bunch lol

  1. Margaret Collyer's Avatar Margaret Collyer

    I believe it is quite obvious that there is a lack of understand regarding human sexuality. Science teaches us that homosexuality is not a learned behavior but rather within the individual as a variation of normal sexuality. The past argument has centered on a belief that same sex behavior does not occur in nature except when animals are in captivity at zoos, etc. However, giraffe males routinely perform sexual behavior with other males except when they mate with females for reproduction purposes. Straight children will not become gay as the result of encounters with gay persons no matter their appearance and behaviors. I think this program can have a positive effect on young people who feel different and who see non-mainstream people being creative, and accepted.

    1. Hank Stanco's Avatar Hank Stanco

      Where does science teach that. Giraffes aren't human. is the drag queen pictured a heterosexual or homosexual? I'm guessing he is promoting his own sexuality on the minds of young developing minds.

  1. Margaret Collyer's Avatar Margaret Collyer

    I believe it is quite obvious that there is a lack of understand regarding human sexuality. Science teaches us that homosexuality is not a learned behavior but rather within the individual as a variation of normal sexuality. The past argument has centered on a belief that same sex behavior does not occur in nature except when animals are in captivity at zoos, etc. However, giraffe males routinely perform sexual behavior with other males except when they mate with females for reproduction purposes. Straight children will not become gay as the result of encounters with gay persons no matter their appearance and behaviors. I think this program can have a positive effect on young people who feel different and who see non-mainstream people being creative, and accepted.

  1. Kenneth J Ferrugiaro's Avatar Kenneth J Ferrugiaro

    So called traditional hetero relationships have to look at and improve their own track record before they judge others. Love is the most important thing.

  1. Richard Lee Cornell's Avatar Richard Lee Cornell

    Harry Poters books were also dislike by certain people because they taught magic on being a wizard. Having kids to be interested in reading and you have moved their dull world into fun.

  1. Frederick Richard Sneathern's Avatar Frederick Richard Sneathern

    Don't worry about it. Keep the faith and Keep your children home and away from it. Leave it in Gods hands. In the time of Noah the world was filled with wickedness and sin. Luke 17:26 "Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be in the days of the Son of Man."

    As in the days of Noah, God will bring forth his wrath upon them. We are all children of the same universe, But not all children of the same God !

    1. Lionheart's Avatar Lionheart

      Your comment is a bit of a stretch Frederick. 1) We actually don’t know any god exists. 2) Noah’s story is even less credible. If you you believe the Three Toed Sloth that moves at a maximum of 6 feet per hour and sleeps most of the day could make it to the ark, along with its mate, for Noah to keep the species going you are seriously deluded, but I admire your faith.


  1. Scott Franklin Collins's Avatar Scott Franklin Collins

    Many may think having a drag queen read to children is innocuous. However, no one seems to be concerned about the psychological impact of all of this on children. No, I dont think gay is catching but gender dysphoria is real psychiatric disorder and now our society is actually encouraging it. Our whole culture is becoming hostile to the mental health of children.

    1. Lionheart's Avatar Lionheart

      Yes, children’s minds are very sensitive. Look at the psychological impact religion has on children. They are so gullible and easily convinced. It is actually mental abuse!


    2. Dr. Darryl G Dykes's Avatar Dr. Darryl G Dykes

      Lionheart just a observation. It took Noah 100 years to build the Ark so I would guess maybe he gave the sloth a heads up on the departure time. Just say'n

      1. Lionheart's Avatar Lionheart

        🤣🤣🤣 I knew there would be a totally logical explanation.🤣🤣🤣


  1. Ronald J. Tuman's Avatar Ronald J. Tuman

    These people are sick to expose this depravity to our children.

    1. Lionheart's Avatar Lionheart

      I totally agree. It’s the same with religion.


  1. Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey's Avatar Jennifer Rebecca Lovsey

    Bigoted holy rollers that need to be removed from public office.

  1. Jennifer Elizabeth Ashley's Avatar Jennifer Elizabeth Ashley

    First we must look at the bigger picture here, this isn't about the story hour, it's about a bigger agenda, this is truly to cause division, when we can be divided we are weaker, when we are together we are powerful, no matter what you believe to be your higher power, we are all energy, when that energy is all together in a positive light we are truly powerful beings, when we are divided by anger we are weak, as beings, just look at this thread, and you will see the problem, may all of you be blessed,

  1. Donald Brown JR's Avatar Donald Brown JR

    You can't teach about God and Jesus in the library so why should you be able to teach about something sinful they shouldn't defend them but they should not allow it

  1. Michael Dooley's Avatar Michael Dooley

    Children DO NOT need to be exposed to this type of perverted way of life so young! There is plenty of time when they are older and able to understand! Their young mind's don't need to be corrupted so young!

    1. Lionheart's Avatar Lionheart

      I totally agree. Children shouldn’t also be exposed to the dogma of any religion so young until they are capable of understanding logic and reason to decide for themselves.


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
Don't have an account yet? Create Account