
A wave of recent military strikes in Iran by the U.S. and Israel have made global headlines, targeting nuclear sites as well as high-ranking military and political figures. Among those considered potential targets is Iran’s leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
But what exactly does the title “Ayatollah” mean? Who earns it, and why is it so important?
Those unfamiliar with Shi’a Islam or who don’t closely follow geopolitics may have first encountered the term when watching the Simpsons years ago:
But let's put Matt Groening humor aside.
The title actually carries enormous religious and historical weight, and has an interesting history you may not know about. We'll break down the meaning of Ayatollah, how a person becomes one, and what significance the title holds.
A Sign of God
The word Ayatollah comes from Arabic: “Āyat Allāh” translates to “Sign of God” or “Divine Sign.” It’s a term loaded with spiritual significance, not unlike how “Reverend” is derived from “reverendus” in Latin, meaning “one who must be respected.”
In the context of Shi’a Islam, Ayatollah is a recognition of someone’s advanced religious scholarship, moral authority, and ability to issue rulings on complex theological matters. While most commonly associated with Iran, the title is also used in other countries with sizable Shi’a populations, including Iraq and Lebanon.
What is the Difference Between Sunni and Shi'a?
Some important context: Islam is divided into two main branches, Sunni and Shi’a. While both share core beliefs – such as reverence for the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad – they differ over questions of leadership and authority.
Sunnis believe the community should select its leaders, while Shi’a Muslims hold that leadership rightly belongs to the Prophet’s family, specifically through his cousin and son-in-law Ali. This disagreement, rooted in early Islamic history, gave rise to distinct religious practices and clerical structures. The title Ayatollah, for example, is unique to Shi’a Islam.
Related: What is the Difference Between Sunni and Shi'a Islam?
How Does Someone Become an Ayatollah?
In the Twelver branch of Shi’a Islam (the largest Shi’a sect), clerical ranks are well-defined. The progression typically looks like this:
Talabeh – a student at a seminary (hawza)
Hujjat al-Islam – a mid-level cleric, literally “proof of Islam”
Ayatollah – a senior scholar with proven authority to interpret Islamic law
Grand Ayatollah (Ayatollah al-Uzma) – the most senior clerics, who are followed by millions of Shi’a Muslims as marajiʿ (sources of emulation)
To become an Ayatollah, a scholar must demonstrate deep mastery of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), gain the respect of their peers, and be publicly recognized by the Shi’a community.
From Rare Title to Common Term
The term Ayatollah has roots stretching back to the early 20th century, though it wasn’t widely used at first. One of the earliest documented uses was in the 1920s and 30s to describe a small number of exceptionally learned Shi’a clerics in Iran and Iraq – those considered to be true authorities in Islamic jurisprudence. Even then, the title was not institutionalized; it emerged organically as a form of popular respect.
Its prominence grew in the mid-20th century, but wasn’t until the Revolution of 1979 that the term entered the global lexicon and became more widely adopted within Shi’a circles. What was once a rare honorific became a more standardized title.
Today, an Ayatollah could be compared to a Cardinal in the Catholic Church: someone with deep theological knowledge, high community esteem, and even (in some cases) direct political sway.
Like Cardinals, not all Ayatollahs wield the same kind of influence. Some remain focused on scholarship, while others take on more active leadership roles.
So, how did an Ayatollah come to hold unique state-backed authority in Iran?

The Revolutionary Ayatollah
In the late 70s, one person brought the term to newspaper headlines around the world: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
Khomeini was a revolutionary cleric and Grand Ayatollah who led the 1979 uprising that overthrew Iran’s U.S.-backed monarchy. After years in exile, he returned to Iran, overthrew the Shah, and established a new form of government – the Islamic Republic – fusing Shi’a clerical authority with state power.
Khomeini's influence was seismic. He introduced the doctrine of Velāyat-e Faqīh (Guardianship of the Jurist), which gives ultimate authority to a senior Islamic jurist in governing a Shi’a state.
This principle still underpins Iran’s government structure today.
Is Ali Khamenei a Grand Ayatollah?
Khomeini’s chosen successor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei serves as Supreme Leader of Iran today. But interestingly, he is not a Grand Ayatollah.
Iran's constitution originally required the Supreme Leader to also be a Grand Ayatollah. This posed a problem to the regime, as Khamenei would not be qualified. Near the end of Khomeini's life, in 1989, he led a successful effort to rewrite the constitution – essentially changing the rules to allow his successor to take power despite his lack of religious credentials.
As for who will succeed the current Ayatollah, now 86, experts speculate that his son is a potential candidate. Another name being discussed is Khomeini's grandson. However, it is the Assembly of Experts, a body of 88 clerics, that has sole constitutional authority to confirm the next Supreme Leader.
How Many Ayatollahs are There In Iran?
After the revolution, the title became more widespread, both as a sign of reverence and political alignment. Today, any Shi'a cleric who passes the mujtahid exam can be called an Ayatollah.
While the exact number is not known, there are likely hundreds – perhaps thousands – of clerics who carry the title. Grand Ayatollahs are much rarer; the best estimates put their number at around 50 total.
How Much Power Does an Ayatollah Have?
The amount of power an Ayatollah holds varies dramatically depending on the individual and their role. In most cases, an Ayatollah’s influence is spiritual and scholarly – they issue religious rulings (fatwas), teach at seminaries, and guide followers on ethical matters.
However, in Iran, the title takes on a unique political dimension. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is the country’s Supreme Leader, wielding ultimate authority over both the state and the military, even outranking the elected president. Backed by the constitution and a network of loyal clerics and security forces, Khamenei's position combines theological legitimacy with real political control.
38 comments
-
🔥 THE SIGN OF GOD AND THE WAY OF CHRIST
✝️ By Rev JTSUNRISE, Celestial Nexus Church
⸻
📘 What Does “Ayatollah” Mean?
The term “Ayatollah” comes from the Persian/Arabic āyat allāh—literally “Sign of God”. In Shi‘a Islam, it’s a title given to highly learned scholars of faith and law, qualified to guide communities through complex religious questions. The Supreme Leader of Iran, currently Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, draws immense authority from such theological stature, wielding not just spiritual but also political power under the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh (Guardianship of the Jurist).
⸻
🌍 Jesus on Knowing Other Faiths
Jesus never demanded uniformity of belief—he demanded compassion, openness, and discernment beyond religious lines: • He praised the Roman centurion’s faith, saying “I have not found such great faith, even in Israel” . • The Good Samaritan, despised by Jews, becomes the moral hero—demonstrating that love transcends religious borders (Luke 10). • In John 4, Jesus dialogued with a Samaritan woman—healing misconceptions, not enforcing doctrine, and recognizing shared humanity. • His interfaith posture is captured in Matthew: “Whoever is not against us is for us” .
⸻
🧭 A Prophetic Warning: Beware the Idol of Power
Today, religious titles—like Ayatollah—can inspire reverence… but they can also cloak domination when combined with political power. This is “lawlessness within God’s temple”.
According to Scripture:
“The mystery of lawlessness is already at work… he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.” (2 Thess 2:3–4)
When faith becomes a throne—and moral authority is used to justify coercion—it no longer reflects divine love, but echoes the Lawless One.
⸻
🕊️ The Gospel of Consent and Interfaith Witness
In interfaith engagement, Christians must follow Jesus’s fingerprint: • Discern, not dominate. • Love, not legislate. • Recognize virtue, not erect barriers. • Stand with the oppressed, not preach from thrones.
Nostra Aetate, the Catholic affirmation of dignity across faiths, echoes Jesus: “The Church reproves… any harassment… because of… religion”.
⸻
🔥 A Sermon Call
To believers of all traditions—Shi‘a, Christian, Buddhist, Pagan:
Honor the “Sign of God” in each person. Do not bow before titles that mask empire. Instead, follow the Way of Jesus: 1. Embrace outsiders with humility and compassion. 2. Judge not by robes or rank but by deeds of justice. 3. Reject coercive authority disguised as divine mandate. 4. Celebrate spiritual leadership rooted in vulnerability, not violence.
⸻
✅ In Conclusion • Ayatollah means “Sign of God”—and carries real religious weight. • But if that weight crushes agency, mercy, or dialogue, it becomes a false idol. • Jesus taught interfaith openness—and elevated love over law. • We are called to follow his Way, not worship institutions or kings.
⸻
Authority without mercy is idolatry. Unity across faiths is holy resistance to empire. Let the world know that true power kneels beside the marginalized.
-
Thanks for this educational piece. It is good to learn about other religions that is of not one's primary practice.
-
I'm sure most of us are familiar with the biblical term Armageddon good versus evil ,so that being said we all do mostly what's convenient and we what we in our personal lives seem to be necessary to maintain our preferred life styles, relationships, business, etc .Remember the road to he'll is paved with good intentions god bless love you all friend or foe.
-
The only thing that matters. And no matter who you voted for. I think this is something we can all get behind. They should never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Or the capabilities to make one.
-
Why?
-
You should remember that the US is the only country to have actually used a nuclear weapon on an enemy population. Details of the incident fit perfectly the definition of terrorism. I know that it ended a war, but it was dropped on civilians at a time determined to do maximum damage to them. It was not aimed at a military target. Who should not be allowed nuclear weapons, a country that used them on women and children, or a country that has never unilaterally attacked anyone?
-
-
In any religious forum, one would hope to encounter a spirit of understanding, forgiveness, and enlightenment. However, I am disappointed at some of the comments made recently that seem to stray from these ideals. It is essential to remember that our differences in opinion and belief are not weaknesses; rather, they are a testament to the rich tapestry of human experience.
Engaging with diverse perspectives can deepen our understanding and foster compassion among individuals from various backgrounds. In this space dedicated to spiritual growth and dialogue, we should strive to approach each other with kindness and an open heart. By embracing our differences, we not only honour our own beliefs but also create an environment where everyone feels valued and heard. Let us commit ourselves anew to fostering a community built on respect and love for one another’s journeys.
-
👍🏼
-
Absolutely agree
-
-
It seems that there are a lot of ultra right wing posters on here today.
-
Iran has never unilaterally attacked anyone. It has defended itself as is allowable in Islam
-
Ayatollah is the bringer of war and death otherwise he would be popular he is evil no matter what his followers say.
-
Sounds like Trump and his administration
-
Amen Brother!
-
clearly anyone who likes any American president, after jfk's murder does not know anything of history. use presidents are all war mongers, they say they want to bring democracy to all countries, yet now they are heading for ultra communism, where no free speech exists, no demonstrations are allowed, if you go to court they won't allow your rights as an American citizen, and so it goes on and on, all over the world. trump thinks he sorted out a ceasefire and even put himself up for the Nobel peace award, all the while saying that all Palestinians (2.2 million) will be removed and Gaza will be made into a playground for the rich.totally unfathomable with their hypocrisy. PEACE,LOVE, RESPECT AND GOOD WILL WILL ONLY MAKE THIS WORLD A BETTER PLACE TO LIVE, NOT THE GREEDY CORPORATIONS THAT GIVE BACK HANDERS TO POLITICIANS.
-
By the way Communism is not always negative it’s core values are to share Humanity tends to exploit in even capitalism which can also be corrupted and exploited by those who are willing to
-
-
-
-
Is that why Iran has never unilaterally attacked anyone?
-
-
Hmm, Coward, hiding behind religion. See "Nazi"
-
Not that I agree with these people but it seems that every person you dont agree with is a nazi. hows about you grow up
-
If the shoe fits. What's the matter Dan, starting to question your beliefs? I call it like I see it. If you don't like it, then I'm doing something right. 🙂
-
You're not
-
If I make a zealot uncomfortable than I am. I put forth that more deaths have been caused by radical religious beliefs.
-
That doesn't make them Nazis, it makes them religious zealots
-
-
-
Brien, The Nazi's were on a holy Christian crusade, so what's your point?
-
-
-
-
It means assaholla.
-
With comments like that (unoriginal too) you shouldn't even be on this forum.
-
It’s my job to point out the truth to imbeciles.
-
Truth is relative, your 'truth' isn't a truth, especially when it's plagiarised from the Simpsons
-
Truth is relative, your 'truth' isn't a truth, especially when it's plagiarised from the Simpsons
-
-
-
-
The revolutionary clerics of any religion are steeped in evil. They need to be expelled from polite society!
-
So should that also apply to Christian leaders in politics too
-
Absolutely!
-
Religion and politics should never mix.
-
-
Agreed. If you go back in history all the way to the ancient Roman Empire, a theocracy state has always been corrupt and warmongering. Some of the most corrupt were some of the early Popes, which insisted on the indulgences that led to the extravagent building of the "Palace for the Pope," today, called the Vatican and led to the protestant reformation. "Holy wars" are a contradiction in terms, because how can anything that anhilates people be considerred "holy" in ANY religion. The Christian nationalist movement in this country scares me more than anything else, mainly because the "brand" of Christianity behind the movement is not one that I subscribe to. If you read the article carefully, there is a lot of similarities between the structure of Islam, and the conflict between the Sunni and Shi'a and the structure and discourse between various Christian denominations.
-
-
The Revolutionary Ayatollahs are totally evil. They are demon possessed human beings and minions of Satan.
-
What, because they oppose the US backed Palavi regime?
-
I’m all for religious freedom. However, when you put religious zealots in political power, this is where the problems start. In Iran the current government has for decades supported terrorism. All with the belief that their religious beliefs are valid and that anyone who is not in their religion are followers of Satan and must be destroyed.
Like Israel but less prepared to attack their neighbours?